Eli Roth’s ‘Ice Cream Man’ Aims for Shock Value but Lands as a Preachy One-Joke Splatter
Eli Roth's latest splatter film offers gruesome practical effects but little substance, squandering its transgressive premise on shallow shock theatre.

Eli Roth has built a career pushing boundaries. His 2005 film 'Hostel: Part II' presented an eerily plausible nightmare about the ultra-wealthy murdering strangers for sport. 'Thanksgiving', which expanded his 'Grindhouse' trailer into a feature, treaded into holiday-horror satire with impish humour. But 'Ice Cream Man', his latest venture into transgressive cinema, reveals the limits of shock without substance.
The premise arrives fully formed in the title. In the picturesque town of Bayleen Bay, a sinister ice-cream vendor (Ari Millen) distributes demonically possessed frozen treats to unsuspecting children. Those who consume the cones—flavoured with names like Locust Lick and Serpent Swirl—transform into zombie slashers who systematically murder their parents and teachers. It is 'Village of the Damned' meets 'Weapons', a mash-up that sounds intentionally provocative until the film itself confirms it has little to say beyond the premise.
What unfolds is jaw-droppingly bare-bones filmmaking masquerading as lark. The infected children, their mouths smeared with blue and chocolate ice-cream residue, become an undifferentiated mob of teenage actors glowering through zombie makeup. Roth orchestrates escalating acts of violence—hacksaw murders, baseball-bat beatings, decapitations with a scoop-shaped blade, children jumping rope with intestines—with the sensibility of a carnival barker rather than a provocateur earning his transgression.
Where Practical Effects Become a Crutch
Roth's obsession with practical gore recalls Herschell Gordon Lewis's grindhouse carnivalry, yet the comparison itself exposes the film's weakness. Damien Leone, who directs the 'Terrifier' films, wields practical effects to construct escalating arias of horror; his killer clown Art exists as a fully realised embodiment of the extremity he commits. By contrast, the children in 'Ice Cream Man' feel fundamentally unconvincing as natural aggressors, rendering the violence more artificial than intended, despite—or because of—Roth's heavy investment in tangible gore.
The film's cheesy, overbright aesthetic and anti-establishment undertone (corrupt teachers and parents deserve their fates) channel 1980s grindhouse pastiche without conviction. Three uninfected children, led by the lactose-intolerant Jared (Charlie Zeltzer), stumble into a freezer where a priest (Benjamin Byron Davis) expounds the ice-cream man's origin: a Catholic child-abuse scandal and wrongful blame. It is so preposterous that even a horror-movie convention would reject it. The ice-cream man appears in court wearing his full uniform. The film winks at its own absurdity as though self-awareness absolves it of the duty to engage.
The Cop-Out of Irony
That knowing tone is, ultimately, a retreat. Roth's 'it's-all-a-big-joke' framing avoids the harder work of crafting a horror film that truly unsettles or provokes genuine thought. With minor adjustments, 'Ice Cream Man' could function as a 'Saturday Night Live' horror parody—or even as a rejected pitch from the original 'Grindhouse' project. Instead, it settles into preachy shock-for-shock's sake: a one-joke premise stretched to 86 minutes, bloated with gore but hollow at its core.
For all its technical ambition and tonal swagger, 'Ice Cream Man' proves that transgression without purpose is merely noise. Roth once knew the difference.



